The Elizabethan English in the Dutch Revolt: Soldiers, Merchants, and Spies
England’s role in the Dutch Revolt is often overshadowed by the Armada of 1588. This article explores the English soldiers, diplomats, and merchants who shaped the conflict.
The air in Whitehall Palace was warm with the scent of fresh rushes and beeswax candles, the tapestries along the walls muffling the chatter of courtiers in their silks and brocades. A young nobleman, dressed in the latest fashion with a stiff lace ruff and a gilded, long-bladed rapier at his hip, listened as the Queen’s ministers debated war.
Across the sea, in the Low Countries, the picture could not have been more different. There, starving Dutch soldiers huddled in shattered towns, their clothes ragged, their hands stiff with cold as they fought against Philip II’s armies.
The contrast was striking—here, power and ceremony; there, suffering and defiance. England had long sent money and arms in secret, but now, the question lingered: Would Elizabeth commit more?
— —
📖 History, 🎨 art, & 🎲 games from the Renaissance Netherlands & Europe 1549-1619
☙ facebook.com/rebelsorbeggars
☙ instagram.com/rebelsorbeggars
☙ bsky.app/profile/rebelsorbeggars.bsky.social
☙ rebelsorbeggars.com
— —
Many know of Elizabeth I’s defiance against Spain in the famous year of 1588, when her navy faced the Great Armada. But fewer know of England’s earlier entanglement in the Dutch Revolt, a war raging just across the English Channel in what is now the Netherlands and Belgium.
For years, the Queen and her countrymen played a dangerous game, secretly aiding the Dutch rebels against their Spanish overlords while avoiding full-scale war. Yet, as the conflict deepened, many English men and women—soldiers, diplomats, merchants, and artists—became directly involved in shaping the fate of the Low Countries.
This article sheds light on their stories, revealing how England’s role in the Dutch Revolt helped reshape the course of European history.
England’s Hesitation and the Crisis That Forced Its Hand
Elizabeth I did not rush into war. The Dutch Revolt, which began in 1568 as a rebellion against Spanish rule, dragged on for years before England became directly involved. While Elizabeth sympathized with the Protestant rebels, she was reluctant to provoke Philip II of Spain. Spain was the dominant military power of the age, and England, still stabilizing after the upheavals of the Reformation, was in no position to challenge it directly.
Instead, Elizabeth relied on covert support. English merchants funneled supplies to the rebels, privateers harassed Spanish shipping, and Protestant exiles in England maintained ties with the Dutch resistance. Figures like Francis Walsingham, Elizabeth’s spymaster, urged stronger intervention, seeing the revolt as a battle for Protestant survival. But Elizabeth hesitated, fearing open war.
The turning point came in the 1580s. In 1584, William of Orange, leader of the Dutch rebellion, was assassinated by a Spanish agent. His death left the revolt leaderless and vulnerable. At the same time, the Spanish commander Alexander Farnese, Duke of Parma, launched a series of successful campaigns that recaptured much of the southern Netherlands. With Farnese advancing and the Dutch on the brink of collapse, Elizabeth could no longer stand aside.
In 1585, she signed the Treaty of Nonsuch, formally allying England with the Dutch rebels. This marked England’s first official military intervention in the conflict. Though her decision came late, it would shape the course of the revolt—and England’s rivalry with Spain—for decades to come.
The key takeaway: Elizabeth’s reluctance to engage in open war was ultimately overridden by necessity. The Dutch Revolt’s survival—and England’s own security—now depended on direct intervention.
Robert Dudley: England’s Troubled Commander in the Low Countries
Robert Dudley, Earl of Leicester, was Elizabeth’s favored courtier and a staunch Protestant. When England finally committed troops to aid the Dutch, Leicester was placed in command. In 1585, Elizabeth sent an English expeditionary force under his leadership to the Netherlands.
Leicester’s tenure was disastrous. Though personally brave and devoted to the Protestant cause, he was a poor military commander and an even worse diplomat. He struggled to coordinate with Dutch leaders, clashed with local officials, and made strategic blunders. His greatest mistake came when he accepted the title of “Governor-General” of the United Provinces, a move that angered Elizabeth, who had not authorized him to assume such authority.
The campaign quickly unraveled. Leicester failed to halt the advances of Farnese, and English troops performed poorly in key engagements. He returned to England in disgrace in 1587, his reputation tarnished. The English presence in the Low Countries continued, but under different leadership.
Why he’s important: Despite his failures, Leicester’s campaign marked the first formal English military intervention in the Dutch Revolt, a turning point in Anglo-Spanish relations.
Francis Walsingham: The Spymaster’s War for Protestantism
Francis Walsingham, Elizabeth’s principal secretary and spymaster, was one of the most ardent supporters of intervention in the Netherlands. A staunch Protestant, he viewed Spain as an existential threat to England’s religious and political survival.
Even before open war, Walsingham played a key role in supporting the Dutch cause. He coordinated financial aid, facilitated intelligence networks, and encouraged privateering against Spanish shipping. His spies provided crucial information on Spanish plans, including the movements of the Duke of Parma.
Walsingham’s influence extended beyond espionage. He was instrumental in persuading Elizabeth to commit forces to the Low Countries, arguing that defending the Dutch was a matter of both national security and moral obligation. His long-standing warnings about Spanish ambitions proved justified when Philip II launched the Spanish Armada in 1588.
Why he matters: Walsingham’s vision of an international Protestant alliance against Catholic Spain shaped Elizabethan foreign policy and strengthened England’s commitment to the Dutch Revolt.
Thomas Bodley: The Diplomat Who Held England’s Alliance Together
While Leicester struggled in the field, Sir Thomas Bodley worked behind the scenes to keep England’s Dutch alliance intact. A scholar and diplomat, Bodley had lived in the Netherlands as a child when his Protestant family fled Marian England. He later became Elizabeth’s chief representative to the Dutch from 1588 to 1597.
Bodley played a crucial role in negotiating English support and ensuring cooperation between the Dutch and English forces. Unlike Leicester, he understood the political landscape of the United Provinces and worked to maintain stability in the Anglo-Dutch alliance. His efforts ensured that, even after Leicester’s failure, England remained engaged in the conflict.
Why he matters: Bodley’s diplomacy kept England’s Dutch alliance from collapsing, helping sustain resistance against Spanish rule.
Sir Philip Sidney: The Poet-Warrior of Zutphen
Sir Philip Sidney, a celebrated poet, soldier, and courtier, was one of the most iconic figures of the Elizabethan age. A firm Protestant and an advocate for English intervention, Sidney served in the Netherlands under Leicester’s command.
His most famous moment came at the Battle of Zutphen in 1586. During an English attempt to relieve the besieged city, Sidney was mortally wounded in combat. According to legend, as he lay dying, he passed his water to a wounded soldier, saying, “Thy necessity is yet greater than mine.” Whether fact or myth, the story cemented his legacy as a chivalric hero.
Sidney’s death was a severe loss for English morale. He was not only a capable soldier but also a powerful symbol of the Protestant cause. His writings, including The Arcadia and The Defence of Poesy, further enhanced his posthumous fame.
The key takeaway: Sidney embodied the ideal of the Renaissance warrior-poet, and his sacrifice became a rallying point for the English war effort.
John Norris: The Seasoned Soldier of the Elizabethan Wars
John Norris was one of England’s most experienced commanders of the era. Unlike Leicester, he had real battlefield expertise, having fought in France, Ireland, and the Low Countries.
Norris led English troops in the Netherlands with skill, though he often found himself undermanned and underfunded. His forces played a key role in skirmishes and defensive actions, but they were rarely strong enough to shift the tide of the war.
One of Norris’s defining qualities was his resilience. He operated in harsh conditions, leading small, disciplined forces against superior Spanish troops. Though he never achieved a decisive victory, he provided steady leadership when England’s intervention was at its most fragile.
Why he’s important: While Leicester’s failures drew attention, Norris’s competence ensured that England remained a factor in the Dutch Revolt, even when resources were scarce.
Sir Edward Cecil: Statesman Soldier
A professional soldier who fought in the Dutch Revolt, Cecil served under Maurice of Nassau, the Prince of Orange. He gained valuable military experience in the Netherlands, which later influenced his role in England’s military campaigns. His career is an example of how the war served as a training ground for English officers.
Why he matters: Cecil’s service under Dutch command highlights how the war shaped England’s next generation of military leaders.
The Merchant Adventurers: England’s Economic Stake in the Netherlands
England’s relationship with the Dutch was not purely military—commerce played a critical role as well. The Merchant Adventurers, one of England’s most powerful trading guilds, had long been active in the Netherlands, particularly in Antwerp before the Spanish Fury of 1576 devastated the city.
After Antwerp’s decline, many English merchants relocated to Amsterdam, helping the city emerge as a new center of trade. Their presence strengthened Anglo-Dutch ties and provided financial backing for the rebellion. English merchants also played a key role in smuggling supplies to the Dutch, defying Spanish blockades.
Why they matter: Economic interests often drive political decisions, and England’s investment in Dutch commerce gave Elizabeth another reason to support the revolt.
Nicholas Hilliard: Anglo-Dutch Influence in Art
The Dutch Revolt not only reshaped politics but also influenced artistic exchange between England and the Netherlands. One of the most notable figures in this cultural interaction was Nicholas Hilliard, England’s foremost miniaturist.
Studying under the Dutch master Lucas de Heere (himself having emigrated to London from the turmoils in Ghent), Hilliard’s portrait work, including his depictions of Elizabeth I and English nobles, was deeply influenced by Netherlandish artistic techniques.
While England did not have the large-scale artistic patronage seen in the Netherlands, artists like Hilliard borrowed Dutch styles in their approach to detail, composition, and color.
This artistic exchange extended beyond individual painters. The Netherlands’ vibrant print culture also influenced English engravers and publishers, helping shape the visual identity of Elizabethan England.
Why he matters: Cultural exchange between England and the Netherlands during the Dutch Revolt influenced English art, printmaking, and portraiture for generations.
England’s Role in the Dutch Revolt: Legacy and Impact
England’s intervention in the Dutch Revolt was inconsistent, often hesitant, and plagued by mismanagement. Yet, despite these setbacks, it played a crucial role in preventing a total Spanish victory.
By committing troops, supplies, and financial aid, England helped sustain the Dutch rebellion long enough for the United Provinces to establish themselves as an independent power. Though the war would continue for decades, the English intervention marked a turning point—one that weakened Spain and strengthened Protestant Europe.
What do you think? Could Elizabeth have done more to support the Dutch, or was her caution justified?
📖 Recommended Reading
For a deeper dive into England’s role in the Dutch Revolt, Elizabeth’s Wars: War, Government and Society in Tudor England 1544-1604 by Paul E.J. Hammer (Palgrave Macmillan, 2003) provides a detailed analysis of Elizabethan military policy and its broader implications.